This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
en:quantum_registers [2021/01/14 22:30] jaddawyn |
en:quantum_registers [2021/01/16 10:29] (current) |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| Let's considers the following experiment: | Let's considers the following experiment: | ||
| {{ : | {{ : | ||
| - | (1) At the left we have a source of qbits (or quantum particles) emitted by a single source in two separate direction. At the right we have two detectors facing the trajectory of qbits.\\ | + | (1) At the left we have a source of qubits |
| - | (2) Each qbit is traveling from the source to the detector in a superposed state between |0> and |1> before being read |0> or |1>. | + | (2) Each qubit is traveling from the source to the detector in a superposed state between |0> and |1> before being read |0> or |1>. |
| \\ | \\ | ||
| \\ | \\ | ||
| - | We could imagine that the behavior with two qbits is the same than one qbit separated from the another. But we have two qbits emitted by the same source, and it changes everything because in this case they are **entangled**. \\ | + | We could imagine that the behavior with two qubits |
| - | That means that the result of the top qbit is linked to the result of the bottom | + | That means that the result of the top qubit is linked to the result of the bottom |
| \\ | \\ | ||
| - | If we would have two sources with two detectors, each qbit would be in the state seen in the previous chapter:\\ | + | If we would have two sources with two detectors, each qubit would be in the state seen in the previous chapter:\\ |
| ;#; | ;#; | ||
| - | <m 15> | + | <m 13> |
| ;#; | ;#; | ||
| - | But since we have a single source emitting two entangled | + | But since we have a single source emitting two entangled |
| ;#; | ;#; | ||
| - | <m 15> | + | <m 13> |
| ;#; | ;#; | ||
| - | And because Greek letters does not help to know the corresponding state we use only alpha with the state in little: | + | And because Greek letters does not help to know the corresponding state we use only alpha with the state in little |
| ;#; | ;#; | ||
| - | <m 15> | + | <m 13> |
| ;#; | ;#; | ||
| + | And the associated matrix is: | ||
| + | ;#; | ||
| + | <m 13> | ||
| + | ;#; | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | This is crazy isn't it? When they are detected, qubits are in different places in space, yet there is a link between the result read by detectors. However during their travel from source to detectors (at the speed of light) each of them are in a superposed states:all states at the time or |0> and |1> at the same time - you choose.\\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | This is one of the great mystery of quantum mechanics. John Stewart Bell proposed three possibilities: | ||
| + | * particles communicates during the travel, | ||
| + | * particles shares information when leaving the source, | ||
| + | * particles should not be considered as two separate objects but as one. | ||
| + | In 80's, it has been demonstrated that the two particles does not share the information at their start. Therefore they must exchange the information when measured by detectors. But that would mean the information is transmitted faster than light. What is impossible according to Einstein' | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | This mystery has not been solved and we still don't know how particles share amplitudes of probabilities. We will come back on this mystery later because it is fascinating. It will also leads us to another big notion of quantum physics: **quantum teleportation**. | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | XXX Donner un exemple d' | ||
| <columns 100% 50% -> | <columns 100% 50% -> | ||
| Line 30: | Line 48: | ||
| < | < | ||
| ;;# | ;;# | ||
| - | Next: XXX | + | Next: [[en: |
| ;;# | ;;# | ||
| </ | </ | ||